C# Code Review Standards Document


Introduction

This document outlines the standard parameters and best practices used in daily C# code reviews. It ensures consistency, readability, maintainability, and performance across projects.


1. Naming Conventions

  • Classes & Interfaces: Use PascalCase (e.g., CustomerService, IRepository).

  • Methods: Use PascalCase (e.g., GetCustomerById).

  • Variables & Fields: Use camelCase (e.g., customerName).

  • Constants: Use ALL_CAPS with underscores (e.g., MAX_RETRY_COUNT).

  • Async Methods: End with Async (e.g., SaveDataAsync).


2. Code Structure

  • Keep methods short and focused (ideally < 30 lines).

  • Follow Single Responsibility Principle (SRP).

  • Use regions sparingly for logical grouping.

  • Ensure proper indentation and spacing.


3. Error Handling

  • Use try-catch-finally blocks appropriately.

  • Avoid swallowing exceptions; always log them.

  • Use custom exceptions for domain-specific errors.

  • Prefer throw; over throw ex; to preserve stack trace.


4. Logging & Monitoring

  • Use structured logging (e.g., Serilog, NLog).

  • Avoid logging sensitive information.

  • Ensure logs provide context (user ID, request ID).


5. Performance & Optimization

  • Use async/await for I/O-bound operations.

  • Avoid unnecessary object creation.

  • Use StringBuilder for string concatenation in loops.

  • Optimize LINQ queries; avoid client-side evaluation.

  • Use caching where applicable.


6. Security

  • Validate all user inputs.

  • Use parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection.

  • Avoid storing sensitive data in plain text.

  • Follow OWASP guidelines for secure coding.


7. Testing

  • Ensure unit tests cover critical logic.

  • Use mocking frameworks for dependencies.

  • Follow AAA (Arrange-Act-Assert) pattern in tests.

  • Maintain >80% code coverage.


8. Documentation

  • Use XML comments for public methods.

  • Provide clear summaries for classes and interfaces.

  • Keep README and API documentation updated.


9. Code Review Checklist

  • ✅ Naming conventions followed

  • ✅ Code is readable and maintainable

  • ✅ No hard-coded values

  • ✅ Proper error handling

  • ✅ Logging implemented

  • ✅ Performance optimized

  • ✅ Security best practices applied

  • ✅ Unit tests written and passing

  • ✅ Documentation updated


Conclusion

By following these standards, teams can ensure high-quality, maintainable, and secure C# code. Regular reviews based on these parameters help catch issues early and promote best practices.


This was part of Interview Preparation With Bipin — Let’s Crack It!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Angular Architecture

Why should I learn Angular?

Solid Principle